Cases 21 - 30 of 100
PEREZ v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Delfidio Perez
Defendant:
Freddie L Bryant, III, Tony B Herring, Jr., Kenneth L Weston, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Owners Insurance Company v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
James Carter, Bridget Herring and United Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Golden Eagle AG Labor Consulting, LLC et al v. Butler et al
as 1:2022cv02851
Plaintiff:
Golden Eagle AG Labor Consulting, LLC, Jesus Alberto Gonzales and Herring Farms, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Butler, Christina Smith and Martin J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herring v. Maddox
as 1:2022cv02618
Petitioner:
Cedric Herring
Respondent:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herring v. Hunter et al
as 1:2022cv02619
Petitioner:
Cedric Herring
Respondent:
Linda Hunter, John Caldwell and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERRING v. BERRY
as 1:2022cv00074
Petitioner:
JAMES HERRING
Respondent:
WALTER BERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herring v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv02316
Plaintiff:
Cedric Herring
Defendant:
Melody Maddox, Linda Hunter and John Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERRING v. BERRY
as 5:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
JAMES HERRING
Respondent:
WALTER BERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herring v. The State of Georgia
as 1:2022cv02271
Petitioner:
Cedric Herring
Respondent:
The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
