Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Timberland v. Kelso et al
as 2:2013cv01949
Plaintiff:
Ronald Timberland
Defendant:
Clark J. Kelso, Ron Barnes, D. Swingle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velazquez et al v. Waste Management National Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01404
Plaintiff:
Teodora Velazquez , Phillip Perry , Paul Blum and others
Defendant:
Waste Management National Services, Inc. , Waste Management of California, Inc. and Waste Management of Alameda County, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
William M Hitchcock v. James Robert Cahill et al
as 8:2013cv00376
Defendant:
James Robert Cahill, Quintessential Rare Books LLC and Rare Books Inc
Plaintiff:
William M Hitchcock
Brian Hitchcock v. City of Hermosa Beach et al
as 2:2012cv06570
Defendant:
City of Hermosa Beach, Does, Officer Anthony Parente and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Hitchcock
Chatman v. Medina
as 2:2011cv00681
Plaintiff:
Charles James Chatman
Defendant:
David M. Medina, D. Swingle, J. Nepomuceno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Sheldon Abend Revocable Trust v. NBC Universal Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00037
Defendant:
Does, General Electric Company, NBC Universal Inc and others
Plaintiff:
The Sheldon Abend Revocable Trust
Borden v. Gautier
as 2:2010cv02435
Defendant:
R. Gautier, R. Hitchcock, S. Glen and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel F. Borden, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hitchcock v. City of Oakland
as 3:2009cv01472
Plaintiff:
Virginia Hitchcock
Defendant:
City of Oakland, City of Oakland, City of Oakland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hitchcock v. City of Oakland
as 4:2009cv01472
Plaintiff:
Virginia Hitchcock
Defendant:
City of Oakland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knapp v. Arlitz et al
as 1:2009cv00412
Plaintiff:
Eric Charles Rodney Knapp
Defendant:
Arlitz, Matthew Cate, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
