Cases 21 - 30 of 65
McCUSKER v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2014cv05670
Plaintiff:
JAMES McCUSKER
Defendant:
HIBU PLC , HIBU INC. , MIKE POCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAIRNS v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2014cv05671
Defendant:
ELIZABETH G. CHAMBERS, BOB GREGERSON, BOB WIGLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MARK CAIRNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER et al v. FOCUS FIBER SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2014cv01681
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ALEXANDER , CHAD ALLRED , CHARLES BILLS and others
Defendant:
FOCUS FIBER SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., BEACON ENTERPRISE GROUP, INC., CMK RESOURCE GROUP L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HARRISON et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05816
Plaintiff:
LATRESHA HARRISON , CARMEN HAYES , DANNY HENDRIX and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOOPER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03706
Petitioner:
BRIAN HOOPER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and LOUIS FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOOPER v. HORTH et al
as 2:2013cv01108
Plaintiff:
LINTON HOOPER
Defendant:
JAMES R. HORTH and ESCRO TRANSPORT LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
JENKINS v. CRAYTON et al
as 2:2012cv01533
Plaintiff:
EDWARD F JENKINS
Defendant:
CRAYTON, ROLL, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Crayton et al
as 3:2012cv02006
Plaintiff:
Edward F Jenkins
Defendant:
Crayton, Roll, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Bledsoe et al
as 1:2011cv02318
Plaintiff:
James A. Lucas
Defendant:
B.A. Bledsoe, E. Stuart and T. Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOOPER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56906
Plaintiff:
ALFRED F. HOOPER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
