Cases 21 - 30 of 43
HORN v. KYLE et al
as 1:2015cv01707
Plaintiff:
SEAN M. HORN
Defendant:
KYLE, AKOUKO, KEIFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORNE v. POTOMAC PREPARATORY P.C.S.
as 1:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
DIEDRE HORNE
Defendant:
POTOMAC PREPARATORY P.C.S.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
HORN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2012cv02041
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. HORN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ACCESS HOUSING INC. (DC) and CRAWFORD EDGEWOOD MANAGERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
KAKOSCH v. LOSCHER et al
as 1:2012cv01951
Plaintiff:
HANNO KAKOSCH
Defendant:
PETER LOSCHER, CROMME, HEINRICH VON PIERER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JONES v. KIRCHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01334
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE JONES
Defendant:
STEVE KIRCHNER, JOSEPH SOPATA, STEPHEN NAUGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2012cv01219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. STEVENS
Defendant:
CHARLES LOCKETT, CRAIG APKER, RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREPPEL v. REASON et al
as 1:2010cv01641
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE TREPPEL
Defendant:
J. PAUL REASON, CHARLES W. WOORMAN, IV, DAVID R. GOODE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. LIEBER et al
as 1:2010cv00768
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE JONES
Defendant:
RACHEL LIEBER, JOHN GEISE, STEPHANIE YANTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORN v. HUDDLE, et al
as 1:1994cv01756
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. HORN
Defendant:
ARTHUR BROWN and FRANKLIN PANCHO HUDDLE
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , AL-HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION, INC. , WENDELL BELEW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
