Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Yates v. Chase et al
as 4:2011cv02013
Plaintiff:
Willie Mae Yates
Defendant:
Chase , IBM Lender Business Process Services, Inc. , Federal National Mortgage a/k/a Fannie Mae and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Albright v. IBM Lender Business Process Services Inc
as 4:2011cv01045
Plaintiff:
Gerry P. Albright
Defendant:
IBM Lender Process Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fandrich and All Others v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Fandrich and All Others
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC , Fannie Mae ("Federal Process Mortgage Association") and IBM Lender Business Process Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. IBM Model Think Pad Laptop Computer et al
as 3:2009cv00432
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
IBM Model Think Pad Laptop Computer, Hitachi Model Travelstar Hard Disk, Sony Model Vaio Desktop Computer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Watson v. Chief Administrative Law Judge et al
as 4:2009cv00310
Petitioner:
Mark J Watson
Respondent:
Chief Administrative Law Judge, US Department of Labor, Bank of America and others
Watson v. Chief Administrative Law Judge et al
as 4:2009mc00025
Petitioner:
Mark J Watson
Respondent:
Chief Administrative Law Judge, US Department of Labor, Bank of America and others
Priority Access Solutions Corporation v. IBM
as 5:2007cv00142
Plaintiff:
Priority Access Solutions Corporation
Defendant:
IBM IBM
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
