Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00896
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pratt v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 3:2020cv00150
Plaintiff:
Henry Pratt
Defendant:
Embassy of Liberia, Washington, D.C., York County Prison, Immigration Custom Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00119
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01302
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00202
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NDAULA v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00028
Respondent:
United States Attorney For The Western District Of Pennsylvania, H. Quay, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Alexander Ndaula
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rad et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv02263
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review/Board of Immigration Appeals, Jeffery Boyles, Roger Pauley and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rad and Reynard Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BUI v. PHILADELPHIA IMMIGRATION CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT et al
as 2:2018cv04326
Respondent:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, D. EDWARD MCFFADDEN and PHILADELPHIA IMMIGRATION CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT
Petitioner:
PHONG Q. BUI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NDAULA v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2018cv00137
Respondent:
L. J. ODDO, H. QUAY, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER NDAULA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02329
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
