Cases 21 - 30 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garner v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2023cv02384
Plaintiff:
Irvin Garner
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv01778
Plaintiff:
Katayoun MAHDIAN SOLTAN ABADI and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Irvin Gadson
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Davis et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Irvin Davis, Sr and Irvin Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC and NSK, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Irvin v. Marriott International Inc
as 4:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Michael Irvin
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Scott Loftin v. Credit Human Federal Credit Union, et al
as 5:2022cv01343
Plaintiff:
Scott Loftin
Defendant:
Credit Human Federal Credit Union and Brent Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
