Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Santiago-Lugo v. US
as 14-1862
Petitioner - Appellant: ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES
In Re: Santiago-Lugo
as 14-1830
Petitioner: ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO
Respondent: JOSE ANIBAL CABRANES, TEXACO PUERTO RICO, INC., BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, as claimant of One Urban Lot #72, located at Ibiza St., Paseo Las Brisas, RP. and others
Israel Santiago-Lugo v. John Rathman
as 14-11055
Petitioner - Appellant: ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN T. RATHMAN
: SERVICE
Israel Santiago-Lugo v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-14384
Petitioner - Appellant: ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN
Santiago-Lugo v. US
as 13-1500
Petitioner: ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Santiago-Lugo v. Rathman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00045
Petitioner: Israel Santiago-Lugo
Respondent: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Santiago-Lugo v. Rathman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv04065
Petitioner: Israel Santiago-Lugo
Respondent: John T Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Santiago-Lugo v. US
as 12-1765
Petitioner: ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO, a/k/a El Doctor
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Interested Party: JOSE ANIBAL CABRANES, TEXACO PUERTO RICO, INC., BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, as claimant of One Urban Lot #72, located at Ibiza St., Paseo Las Brisas, PR and others
Santiago-Lugo v. US
as 11-1829
Petitioner - Appellant: ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES
Santiago-Lugo v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01363
Plaintiff: Israel Santiago-Lugo
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?