Cases 21 - 30 of 114
Rodriguez et. al. v. Ditmas Management Corp. et. al.
as 2:2020cv02816
Defendant:
Sanford Sirulnick, SHP, LLC and Ditmas Management Corp.
Plaintiff:
Adelma Rodriguez and Jaime Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Jose Jaime-Rodriguez
as 20-20280
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE JESUS JAIME-RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv50546
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAIME RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv10511
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jaime Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv10407
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jaime Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jaime-Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05477
Plaintiff:
Marlina Jaime-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RODRIGUEZ v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01647
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
JAIME RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jaime Rodriguez-Carrillo v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-70829
Petitioner:
JAIME RODRIGUEZ-CARRILLO, AKA Jaime Galindo-Rodriguez
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 18-459
Petitioner - Appellant:
Steven Camacho
Petitioner:
Jaime Rodriguez
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 18-457
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jaime Rodriguez and Steven Camacho
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
