Cases 21 - 30 of 257
Olson, Daniel v. Sauk County et al
as 3:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Olson
Defendant:
Sauk County, Aegis Corporation, Cross Jenks Mercer Maffei and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ada City of et al v. Walmart Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00748
Defendant:
Walmart Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Ada City of, Altus City of, Anadarko City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Adams County, PA, et alIn re: Adams County, PA, et al
as 22-3653
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Petitioner:
ADAMS COUNTY, PA, LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP, PA, ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA and others
Christopher Jenks v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2022cv01468
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jenks
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parshall v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
James Parshall
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Charles J. Abbe, Bandel L. Carano and others
Ryan v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Taylor v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Charles J. Abbe, Bandel L. Carano and others
CICCOTELLI v. NEOPHOTONICS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05611
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
NEOPHOTONICS CORPORATION, TIMOTHY S JENKS, CHARLES J. ABBE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Bushansky v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 5:2021cv09825
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Charles J. Abbe, Bandel L. Carano and others
Hendrickson v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06919
Plaintiff:
James Hendrickson
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
