Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Corder v. Does 1-3 et al
as 1:2014cv10363
Plaintiff:
Eric Bryant Corder
Defendant:
John Does 1-3 and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koschman v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv02041
Plaintiff:
Nanci Koschman
Defendant:
The City of Chicago , Ronald Yawger, Rita O'Leary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv06792
Plaintiff:
Terry Coleman
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , John Does 1-3 and Unidentified Chicago Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobbitt v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv01119
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Bobbitt
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, John Does 1-3 and Jan Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Martinez et al
as 1:2011cv04624
Plaintiff:
Timothy Smith
Defendant:
Superintendant Martinez, Correction Officer Rivera, Correction Officer Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. City of Dolton et al
as 1:2011cv02182
Plaintiff:
Lemont Baker
Defendant:
City of Dolton, D. Griffin and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 2:2010cv02242
Petitioner:
Alphonso Crawford, II
Respondent:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, John Does 1-3 and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 1:2010cv06519
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Crawford, II
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, John Does 1-3 and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Rubald #114540 et al
as 1:2009cv07043
Plaintiff:
Seneca Horton, Seneca Horton, Seneca Horton and others
Defendant:
Rubald #114540, John Doe 1-3 and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv00619
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dale Miller
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Dubaka 1, Dubaka 2 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
