Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plummer v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06056
Defendant:
City of New York and John Doe and Jane Doe 1-5
Plaintiff:
Victoria Plummer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06055
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bryant
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe and Jane Doe 1-5 and P.O. Robert Mayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daquin v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05859
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe and Jane Doe 1-5, New York City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Daquin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Klati v. The City Of New York City et al
as 1:2011cv07041
Plaintiff:
Eric Klati
Defendant:
The City Of New York City and John Doe and Jane Doe #1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06651
Plaintiff:
Yalxon Antonio
Defendant:
City of New York , New York City Police Department, Michael Doughterty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramapo Airmont Area Neighbors et al v. The Village of Airmont, New York et al
as 7:2011cv02230
Plaintiff:
Ramapo Airmont Area Neighbors , Ramapo Forum Diner, Inc. and Billy Rodopoulos
Defendant:
The Village of Airmont, New York , The Planning Board for The Village of Airmont, New York , Ian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OZOKA v. GARZA et al
as 2:2009cv05159
Plaintiff:
ADELINE OZOKA
Defendant:
JOSE GARZA, ROBLEDO TRUCKING, JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hanson et al v. Stebbins et al
as 7:2008cv10956
Plaintiff:
Donald Hanson and Tony O'Neill
Defendant:
Houston A Stebbins, James Hayes, Charlotte Worthy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NEFFERDORF v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC. et al
as 1:2004cv03411
Plaintiff:
RICKY NEFFERDORF
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC. , WILLIAM ANDRADE , JAMES J. NEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
