Cases 21 - 30 of 48
HARMON v. HARMON et al
as 2:2018cv00875
Plaintiff:
CURTIS T. HARMON, III
Defendant:
PAMELA HARMON and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 -10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CINTRON-GARCIA v. SANTIAGO-DEJESUS et al
as 5:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
MARCELINA CINTRON-GARCIA
Defendant:
JESUS SANTIAGO-DEJESUS, DANIEL T. WHITE, C. MORAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON COUNTY FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC v. RNN ENTERTAINMENT INC et al
as 2:2017cv00807
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON COUNTY FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Defendant:
RNN ENTERTAINMENT INC, ROMEL MARCUS, DERRICK ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
THOMPSON v. HENS-GRECO et al
as 2:2016cv01100
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
KATHRYN M. HENS-GRECO, KIMBERLY BERKELEY CLARK, KRISTA ABRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Mooney et al
as 4:2016cv00557
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, Tom McGinley, Tony Luscavage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Liu v. BJW LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00430
Plaintiff:
Dong Chang Liu
Defendant:
BJW LLC , Judy Wu and John and Jane Doe #1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DIAZ v. RUCKER et al
as 2:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
CLARISSA DIAZ
Defendant:
COMER RUCKER, SCOTT PAUL , MICHAEL WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPAGHETTI WAREHOUSE RESTAURANTS, INC. v. OLANDER et al
as 2:2015cv00705
Plaintiff:
SPAGHETTI WAREHOUSE RESTAURANTS, INC.
Defendant:
H. WARD OLANDER , SHIRLEY M. OLANDER , KAI OLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSS et al v. AMERICHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2015cv02650
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ROSS and SANDRA D. DIXON-ROSS
Defendant:
AMERICHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, DETHLEFS-PYKOSH SHOOK & MURPHY LAW GROUP, LLC , JONATHAN KONTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
