Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Riches v. X-Men Inc. et al
as 5:2009mc00112
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
X-Men Inc., Hugh Jackman, Liev Schreiber and others
Riches v. Garese et al
as 0:2008cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Barrett Garese, Jason Nadler, Ryan Reber and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Riches et al v. Cumia et al
as 0:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Gregg Hughes, Anthony Cumia and WNEW-FM 102.7
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Gleiberman et al
as 4:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Owen Gleiberman, The Onion A.V. Club and Entertainment Weekly
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Boll et al
as 4:2008cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Uwe Boll, Judson Laipply, Eric Tannenbaum and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Al-Hariri et al
as 5:2008cv00030
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Rafik Al-Hariri and Federal Corrections Institution Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Sahakian et al
as 5:2008cv00026
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
David M. Sahakian and Federal Corrections Institution Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Anderson et al
as 4:2007cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Pamela Anderson, Tommy Lee, Robert J. Ritchie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Riches v. Masters Golf Tournament et al
as 5:2007cv00176
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Masters Golf Tournament, Augusta National Golf Club and Goodyear Blimp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Identity Theft Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00376
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Identity Theft Inc., Computer Hackers L.L.C. and Telephone Phreakers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
