Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Garner et al v. Biden
as 2:2020cv02470
Plaintiff:
Evan Glasco, Joy Elisse Garner, Nicole Harris and others
Defendant:
Donald John Trump and Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of California et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2020cv01563
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
Thomas B. Modly, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. House of Representatives
Petitioner:
Stephen P. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Melissa Lee et al v. Paul Hargrove et al
as 2:2013cv00026
Defendant:
TSgt Luis Armis, Major General David S Baldwin, Captain Ryan Barry and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Lee
Perales v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 2:2011cv01621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U S Marshals Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Stacia Hylton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Azael Dythian Perales v. Orange County Sheriffs Department et al
as 8:2011cv00824
Respondent:
Don Bankhead, Patricia C Bates, Ben S Bernanke and others
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Azael Dythian Perales et al v. Dollar Tree Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01772
Defendant:
Don Bankhead, Alice M Batchelder, Ben S Bernanke and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Steve Edwards and Azael Dythian Perales
Azael Dythian Perales v. United States of America et al
as 8:2010cv01472
Defendant:
Don Bankhead, Ben S Bernanke, Joseph R Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Azael Dythian Perales v. United States of America et al
as 8:2010cv01250
Defendant:
Don Bankhead, Ben S Bernanke, Joseph R Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Congress, et al
as 2:2003cv00804
Plaintiff:
Parviz Karim-Panahi
Defendant:
Congress, Judiciary/Judges/Attorneys, Government of USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
