Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Joyner v. Muniz
as 2:2015at00776
Respondent:
William Muniz
Petitioner:
Sean L. Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joyner v. Muniz
as 2:2015cv01494
Respondent:
William Muniz
Petitioner:
Sean L. Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adel Kamil et al v. Kenneth Joyner et al
as 8:2015cv00429
Plaintiff:
Brown Mechanic Inc. and Adel Kamil
Defendant:
DOES and Kenneth Joyner
Bey v. City Of Oakland et al
as 3:2014cv01626
Plaintiff:
Ali Saleem Bey and John Muhammad Bey
Defendant:
City of Oakland, City of Oakland Police Department, Wayne Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dusen v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2013cv05023
Plaintiff:
Jan Van Dusen
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Kyle Thomas, Michael Valladon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElroy v. Joyner
as 5:2013cv04576
Plaintiff:
Dant Juan D. McElroy
Defendant:
Ersie I. Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesus Acevedo et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2013cv05278
Plaintiff:
Jesus Acevedo, Victor Alvarado, Tony Anabo and others
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance Inc, Chase Home Finance LLC, Does and others
Esche et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03062
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Esche , Noe D. Esquivel , Leenora Evans and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
E. et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2013cv03037
Plaintiff:
C. D.J. E. , Kelly C. Eidson , Matthew W. Eidson and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , Pfizer International LLC , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Joyner v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01307
Plaintiff:
Laverne D. Joyner
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
