Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 249
Herriage et al v. Forest River Inc
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff: Tierra Herriage and Jesse Jenkins, IV
Defendant: Forest River Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02380
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MacDonald v. Duddy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01002
Plaintiff: Kinley MacDonald, Kinley Mary Angela MacDonald, Mary Angela MacDonald and others
Defendant: Michael Duddy, LouAnn Sulton, Robert Mulhern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. NEAL
as 1:2022cv02104
Petitioner: JESS DAVID WOODS
Respondent: RON NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNS v. WRIGHT et al
as 3:2022cv00130
Plaintiff: TAVON BURNS
Defendant: WRIGHT and JESS SNAIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggles v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2022cv00232
Plaintiff: Jesse Ruggles
Defendant: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Type: Contract Insurance
Harrison et al v. Mutual of Omaha Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00266
Plaintiff: Jesse Harrison and Leslie Harrison
Defendant: Mutual of Omaha Mortgage, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Anthony Stites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Woods v. Neal
as 2:2022cv00162
Petitioner: Jess David Woods
Defendant: Warden Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Neal
as 3:2022cv00502
Petitioner: Jess David Woods
Respondent: Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MICKLES v. USA
as 1:2022cv01126
Petitioner: JESSE MICKLES
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?