Cases 21 - 30 of 762
Cunningham v. Fortney et al
as 2:2023cv01949
Plaintiff:
Bradly M Cunningham
Defendant:
Adam Fortney, Stan White, Mike Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Brinton v. Vivint Inc et al
as 3:2023cv06105
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brinton
Defendant:
Vivint Inc., John Does 1-10 and Vivint Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Brinton v. Concora Credit Inc et al
as 3:2023cv06094
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brinton
Defendant:
Concora Credit Inc and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Edgar et al v. Safeway Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01820
Plaintiff:
Peter Edgar and Rachelle Edgar
Defendant:
Safeway Inc., SAS Retail Services, LLC, Safeway Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Brinton v. Aura Sub et al
as 3:2023cv06084
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brinton
Defendant:
Aura Sub and John Does 1-10
Amicus Curiae:
Joshua Lapin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Barton v. Alleviate Tax LLC et al
as 3:2023cv06071
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Alleviate Tax LLC and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brinton v. One Technologies LLC et al
as 3:2023cv06046
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brinton
Defendant:
One Technologies LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
York v. Singh et al
as 2:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Felecia York
Defendant:
Palwinder Singh, Ancor Transport LTD, Jane Doe Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
