Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00369
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Michael Nathan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Edward Beasley
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00360
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
William Frank Norfleet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClenny v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00363
Plaintiff:
Thomas McClenny
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromer v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00357
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Darryl Allan Cromer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00379
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00353
Plaintiff:
Marvin T. Timmons
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Packer v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00367
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
A. Packer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bosher v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00378
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lamont Bosher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Johnson et al
as 3:2009cv00505
Plaintiff:
Manuel Lewis
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
