Cases 21 - 30 of 76
HEARD v. MEXICANS et al
as 1:2019cv02202
Defendant:
MEXICANS, JOHN AND JANE DOES and MUSLIMS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. MEXICANS et al
as 1:2019cv02054
Defendant:
MEXICANS, V. PUTIN, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
H.U.C.U. et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv01964
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, JOHN C SANDERS, JONATHAN HAYES and others
Plaintiff:
M.G.B.V., H.U.C.U. and G.M.C.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PERALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
ANNETTE TOTTEN, TREY TREADWELL, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Plaintiff:
AZAEL D. PERALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLURE v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEN PAXTON, JENNIFER THARP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KEYNES v. DOES 1 TO 100 et al
as 1:2018cv01572
Defendant:
DOES 1 TO 100, John Doe Entities 1-10, JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10 and others
Plaintiff:
David Keynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEGLITZ et al v. BARRY et al
as 1:2018cv01555
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, James Barry, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 100 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Steglitz and Laura Bry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
FONT v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv01559
Defendant:
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, HOMEWOOD SUITES BY HILTON and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. FONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO v. HUDSON
as 1:2018cv01230
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
EUGENE HUDSON, JR. , DANA DUGGINS and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
