Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Owaiian Jones v. Taylor
as 15-6243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
TAYLOR, ADCOCK, WHITAKER and others
Owaiian Jones v. Virginia State Police
as 15-6257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, STAFFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL and others
Jaramillo v. Meade et al
as 1:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Jaramillo
Defendant:
Barbara Meade and Joseph Higgs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owaiian Jones v. USPS
as 15-6043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL, JOSEPH HIGGS, JR. and others
Morris, III v. Creel et al
as 1:2015cv00028
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Morris, III
Defendant:
Creel, Joseph Higgs, Jr. and Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owaiian Jones v. Anthony Puckett
as 15-6031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY PUCKETT, TOMMY GEORGE, RICHTER and others
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail Members of Board of Directors et al
as 1:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail Members of Board of Directors, Commonwealth's Attorney for Virginia, County King George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Virginia State Police et al
as 1:2014cv01683
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Virginia State Police, Stafford County Sheriff's Office, Rappahannock Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv01685
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Higgs et al
as 1:2014cv01665
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Higgs, Jr., Phil Grimes, Lynn Balamula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
