Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Williams v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2019cv00918
Defendant:
J. Wetzel, M. Yost and K. Kauffman
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Brown v. C. Green, et al
as 19-1670
Defendant / Appellee:
G. RALSTON, JOHN E. WETZEL, D. VARNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND BROWN
ROLLIE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2018cv05557
Petitioner:
OMAR ROLLIE
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MR. K. KAUFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peters v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2018cv01935
Petitioner:
Matthew Joseph Peters
Respondent:
PA Attorney General and Superintendent K. Kauffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SEXTON v. TICE et al
as 2:2018cv03034
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER KINZEY, SUPERINTENDENT K. KAUFFMAN, CORRECTION OFFICER WEAKLAND and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SEXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEXTON v. TICE et al
as 3:2018cv01478
Defendant:
Capt. K Kauffman, CORRECTION OFFICER KINZEY, Spencer and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SEXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2018cv01353
Defendant:
Unit Manager G. Ralston and Superintendent K. Kauffman
Plaintiff:
Arnold J. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2018cv01340
Petitioner:
CHARLES PARKER
Respondent:
K. KAUFFMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Green et al
as 3:2018cv00487
Plaintiff:
Raymond Brown
Defendant:
C Green, D Varner, K. Kauffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHUKWU v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2018cv00236
Petitioner:
LOUIS CHUKWU
Respondent:
K. KAUFFMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
