Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016at01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
K&M Installation, Inc.
as 4:2015cv05265
Plaintiff:
K&M Installation, Inc.
Defendant:
United Brotherhood of Carpenters, Local 405 and Carpenters 46 Northern California Conference Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Susan K Scholl et al v. Camden Crown Valley
as 8:2015cv01080
Defendant:
Camden Crown Valley and Does
Plaintiff:
E. K. M. and Susan K Scholl
Trizah Morris et al v. City of Fontana et al
as 5:2015cv00945
Defendant:
City of Fontana, Doe Defendants, Fontana Police Officer Au and others
Plaintiff:
K. M., L. M., O. M. and others
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. D K M Electric Co. Inc.
as 5:2014cv00857
Plaintiff:
Contract Compliance Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund and others
Unknown:
Susan Graham Lovelace, Susan Graham Lovelace, Susan Graham Lovelace and others
Defendant:
D K M Electric Co. Inc.
K & M Builders Inc v. Louise Kelley
as 5:2014cv00279
Plaintiff:
K & M Builders Inc
Defendant:
Louise Kelley
Queen v. Swarthout et al
as 2:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
Charles Vaney Queen
Defendant:
Gary Swarthout, J Zamora, K. M. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United Contractors Insurance Company, Inc. v. R K M Builders, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01954
Plaintiff:
United Contractors Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
R K M Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
