Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Mau v. Ducart et al
as 3:2017cv02548
Plaintiff:
Michael Dwayne Mau, Jr.
Defendant:
Clark E. Ducart, T. Lemos, D. Jacobsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Lewis v. M. Colvin, et al
as 17-15501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY GERARD LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
M. COLVIN, Senior Librarian, K. J. ALLEN, Appeals Examiner and S. MIRANDA, L.T.A.
Cramblit v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
James Cramblit
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, K. J. Allen, Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald York v. M. Biter, et al
as 17-15090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD RAY YORK
Defendant - Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden, C. PFEIFFER, S. RIMBACH and others
Raul Arellano v. CDCR, et al
as 16-56797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden, J. RAMIREZ, Appeal Coordinator (CCII) and others
Sermeno v. CTF Appeals Office et al
as 3:2016cv05895
Plaintiff:
Larry A. Sermeno
Defendant:
CTF Appeals Office, Chief, Office of Appeals, M. Ong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arellano v. Self et al
as 3:2015cv02300
Plaintiff:
Raul Arellano, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Self, G. Stratton, K. J. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Herb L. Gadbury v. State of California, et al.
as 2:2015cv02015
Plaintiff:
Herb L. Gadbury
Defendant:
State of California, K. J. Allen and Brian Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gadbury v. State of California et al
as 3:2015cv04316
Plaintiff:
Herb L. Gadbury
Defendant:
State of California, K. J. Allen and Brian Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Beard et al
as 2:2015cv01481
Plaintiff:
Jasper F. Wilson
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, R. L. Briggs, M. Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
