Cases 21 - 29 of 29
MORRIS v. BAKER
as 5:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
TOMMY L MORRIS
Defendant:
K M BAKER, W BRANDON, LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Auto Body Shop Antitrust Litigation
as 6:2014md02557
Defendant:
First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc., Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, Foremost County Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Auto Body L L C, Ginns Automotive Frame Shop L L C, Alexander Body Shop, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
PNC Bank, National Association v. Mecca Investments, Inc et al
as 6:2014cv00651
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Mecca Investments, Inc. , Akbar Allan Ali , K M Diversified Construction Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. K M Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv20735
Plaintiff:
Elsido Leyva Perez
Defendant:
K M Contracting, Inc. and Keith Manalio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martinez v. K M Contracting Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv22899
Plaintiff:
Luis R. Martinez
Defendant:
K M Contracting Inc. and Keith Manalio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Riley et al v. Duval County Chief Sheriff et al
as 3:2010cv00347
Plaintiff:
Timmy J. Riley and Barbara J Riley
Defendant:
Duval County Chief Sheriff, Duval County State Attorney, Adrian G. Soud and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Martinez v. K M Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv23630
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Martinez and Rogelio Martinez
Defendant:
K M Contracting, Inc. and Keith Manalio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
PAULCIN v. GILLIAM
as 4:2008cv00418
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PAULCIN
Defendant:
T L GILLIAM, J A BARFIELD, K M PAYNTER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FLEISCHMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2007cv00344
Plaintiff:
JAMES FLEISCHMAN
Defendant:
A SMITH, K M STOKES, B A BRUNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
