Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Warren Canady v. Michael Roesler, et al
as 16-20009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN PIERRE CANADY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ROESLER, Senior Warden, KEITH GORSUCH, Assistant Warden, CHARLES LONDIS, Assistant Warden and others
Newton v. Apperson et al
as 1:2015cv00409
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Newton
Defendant:
Jaime Apperson, Keith Gorsuch, Darren B Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alonso v. Gorsuch et al
as 4:2015cv02532
Petitioner:
Luis Alonso
Defendant:
Keith Gorsuch, D. Reese, V. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Joseph et al
as 1:2015cv00320
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Newton
Defendant:
Latasha Joseph, Dave Pille, Vicky Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 15-40960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, STEVEN N. RICH, GENE A. KROLL and others
Canady v. Roesler et al
as 4:2015cv01938
Respondent:
Charles Londis, Keith Gorsuch, Richard Kembro and others
Petitioner:
Warren Pierre Canady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Livingston et al
as 4:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dwain Fields
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, William Stephens, Michael Roesier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Joseph et al
as 1:2013cv00510
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Newton
Defendant:
Latasha Joseph, Dave Pille, Vicky Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clyde Miles v. Steven Rich, et al
as 13-40427
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLYDE DENE MILES
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN RICH, also known as Stevin Rich, GIDEON DANIEL, also known as Gideon A. Daniels, GENE A. KROLL, Assistant Warden and others
Vernon King, Jr. v. Steven Rich, et al
as 13-40315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN N. RICH, also known as Rich N. Steven, BRENDA CHANEY, SHARON D. ALLEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
