Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Pizarro v. Bratton et al
as 1:2017cv01694
Defendant:
Devin Baker, Bill Bratton, Jamie Burke BDS and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Thompson, Jr. et al
as 1:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kenneth G. Thompson, Jr., Amy M. Melcher, Lee M. Pense and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Halsey v. Thompson et al
as 1:2017cv00089
Defendant:
Suzette Davis-McLeod and Kenneth P. Thompson
Plaintiff:
Clifton Halsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halsey v. Thompson et al
as 1:2016cv09970
Plaintiff:
Clifton Halsey
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Thompson and Suzette Davis-McLeod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06653
Defendant:
Police Officer Reid Astrida, P. Barnes, Mayor Bill Blasio and others
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard v. Arresting Officer et al
as 1:2016cv05061
Defendant:
Arresting Officer, Marissa Benton, DA and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
In re: Kenneth Thompson
as 16-12595
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH GREGORY THOMPSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cabeza v. Thompson et al
as 1:2016cv01079
Defendant:
Victor A. Barall, Sean Courtney, Mark Feldman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cabeza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Thompson, Sr. v. Village of Monee, et al
as 16-1283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH N. THOMPSON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
VILLAGE OF MONEE, JOHN CIPKAR, Chief of Police, MICHAEL DRUMM, Police officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
