Cases 21 - 30 of 66
SMITH v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2012cv00182
Plaintiff:
ANTRON SMITH
Defendant:
KENNETH R. CAMERON , JAMIE M. BOYLES , JAMEY P. LUTHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2011cv07345
Petitioner:
DAVID PEPE WILSON
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gillette v. Cameron et al
as 3:2011cv01838
Petitioner:
Gregory K Gillette
Respondent:
Kenneth R. Cameron and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEWIS v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OF PHILADEL et al
as 2:2011cv03999
Petitioner:
KEVIN LEWIS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OF PHILADEL, KENNETH R. CAMERON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Suarez v. Cameron et al
as 1:2011cv01087
Petitioner:
Marcus Suarez
Respondent:
Kenneth R. Cameron and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTIN v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2011cv00124
Petitioner:
ALVIN CHRISTOPHER MARTIN
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON and JOHN E. WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2011cv00091
Petitioner:
JOEL R. DAVIS
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ayres v. Cameron et al
as 1:2011cv00499
Respondent:
Kenneth R. Cameron and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Clinton James Ayres
Amicu:
Daniel J. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MANGINO v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2011cv00222
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MANGINO, II
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LAWRENCE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NOLDER v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2011cv00185
Petitioner:
SHAUN NOLDER
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
