Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Jimmy Cichocki v. Kimberly Foxx, et al
as 21-2290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY CICHOCKI
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY M. FOXX, JOEL L. GREENBLATT, ORLANDO CARRENO and others
Stubblefield v. Reese et al
as 1:2021cv02289
Plaintiff:
Jared Stubblefield
Defendant:
Ryan Reese and Kimberly M Foxx
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv01592
Defendant:
Alex Lopez, Benjamin Kibugi, Agustin Cervantes and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Juan Romeo and Jose Juan Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
David Martin v. State of Illinois, et al
as 21-1149
Defendant / Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHCARE AND FAMILY SERVICES, KIMBERLY M. FOXX, CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MARTIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Nichelle Foster-Bey v. Cook County Circuit Court, et al
as 20-2740
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY M. FOXX, JOAN SINGLETON-LEE, DCFS Investigator, COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHELLE FOSTER-BEY
Clint Krislov, et al v. Karen Yarbrough, et al
as 20-1928
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY M. FOXX, SISAVANH BAKER, DOROTHY BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL POWERS and CLINTON A. KRISLOV
Cichocki v. Foxx et al
as 1:2020cv02165
Defendant:
Song Gao, Donald Cosley, Jason Poje and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Cichocki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trakselis v. Arresting Officer Justice Police IL et al
as 1:2020cv00936
Defendant:
April K Gonzales, Arresting Officer Justice Police IL and Kimberly M Foxx
Plaintiff:
John A Trakselis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cazares v. Culotta et al
as 1:2019cv08046
Defendant:
Joseph H. McMahon, Kimberly M. Foxx and Sara B. Culotta
Plaintiff:
Avangelina V Cazares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
