Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00602
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DadgoStar et al v. St Croix Financial Center Inc et al
as 3:2012mc00003
Plaintiff:
Nicholas DadgoStar and Stephanie Dadgostar
Defendant:
St Croix Financial Center Inc , Kevin M Brandt, Warren Mosler and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Kochenour et al. v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al.
as 1:2011dp22468
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Kochenour and Beverly S. Kochenour
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv01901
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Moore
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Moore v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv01905
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Pearce et al v. Fauerecia Exhaust Systems, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00282
Plaintiff:
Brenda Pearce , Mehboob Akhter , Charles E. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Fauerecia Exhaust Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Daniels v. Kroger Company et al
as 1:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Daniels
Defendant:
Kroger Company, City of Hamilton Police Department, Jim A. Betas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Neal v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv01178
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Neal
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harris v. McDonnell et al
as 1:2008cv00870
Plaintiff:
Ernest C. Harris
Defendant:
Nancy R. McDonnell, Ruth Fischein Cohen and Kevin M. Cafferkey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
