Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Bird et al v. Gilead Sciences Inc
as 4:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
Marvin L Bird, Jr, Bryan Campbell, Clayton Allen Achison and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc and Hunter K. Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bird et al v. Gilead Sciences Inc
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Marvin L. Bird, Jr., Bryan Campbell, Clayton Allen Achison and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc., Gilead Sciences Inc and Hunter K. Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Bird et al
as 3:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
Simon J. King
Respondent:
L. Bird and R. Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Calderon v. Bird
as 2:2021cv02381
Petitioner:
Jose Guadalupe Calderon
Respondent:
L. Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lance Williams v. Rick Hill, et al
as 21-56234
Petitioner / Appellant:
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN L. BIRD, R. FARLEY, Correctional Officer, DANNY SAMUEL and others
BIRD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65656
Plaintiff:
CORY L BIRD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shon Williams v. Glen Pratt, et al
as 21-56072
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHON OLIVENTA WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
GLEN E., PRATT, L. BIRD and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Shon Oliventa Williams v. Glen E. Pratt et al
as 2:2021cv06587
Petitioner:
Shon Oliventa Williams
Respondent:
Glen E. Pratt, L. Bird and People of CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bird et al v. Martinez-Ellis et al
as 0:2021cv00139
Defendant:
RN Melanie Martinez-Ellis, Michael Pacheco, Corizon Health Inc Health Services Administrator and others
Plaintiff:
Chester L Bird, Ryan A Brown and Richard B Dauge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATERMAN v. AT HOME GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02956
Defendant:
LARRY D STONE, KENNETH SIMRIL, LEWIS L BIRD III and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
