Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Next-Gen Inc et al
as 1:2018mc00029
Defendant:
Summit Management Team LLC, Next-Gen Inc, AOSR Corporation and others
Undetermined:
Eric L Johnson
Plaintiff:
Missouri State of and Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
JOHNSON v. NEXT-GEN, INC.
as 1:2018mc00047
Defendant:
AOSR CORPORATION, KEVIN R. BRANDES, CONTEST AMERICA PUBLISHERS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and STATE OF MISSOURI
Receiver:
ERIC L. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01620
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JOHNSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03897
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY L. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv02536
Petitioner:
DARNELL L. JOHNSON
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00566
Petitioner:
Carl L Johnson
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv00608
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MARIA L. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. THE KROGER CO.
as 1:2017cv00406
Plaintiff:
LATONYA L JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE KROGER CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2016cv00165
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Taiwan L Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
