Cases 21 - 30 of 176
Balogun v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
OYEWOLE OLAYIWOLA BALOGUN
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeffery Searls, Michael Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Balogun v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Oyewole Olayiwola Balogun
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeffrey Searls (in his Official and Individual capacity), Michael Ball (in his Official and Individual capacity) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Guthrie v. Rainbow Fencing Inc et al
as 1:2021cv05929
Plaintiff:
Robert Guthrie
Defendant:
Rainbow Fencing Inc and Lawson Burge
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04894
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Howlett v. Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03097
Plaintiff:
Thomas Howlett
Defendant:
Michael E. Daniels, Ann K. Lawson, John N. Dykema and others
Bank Leumi USA v. Trade Finance Trust et al
as 1:2021cv04830
Interpleader:
Girobank International, N.V., Alexander Lawson, Girobank, N.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Lawson v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02986
Defendant:
Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Susan Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Heine v. FedEx Freight, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv04574
Defendant:
Daniel Benjamin Lawson and FEDEX FREIGHT, INC.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Heine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv
Bank Leumi USA v. Trade Finance Trust et al
as 1:2021cv02890
Interpleader:
Girobank International, N.V., Alexander Lawson, Girobank, N.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
