Cases 21 - 30 of 92
Sapp v. Lord et al
as 4:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Shamont Sapp
Defendant:
Albert Lord and Penn State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LORD v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
LYNDA LORD
Defendant:
TREVON W. COLEMAN, NANCY GIROUX, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHIS v. UNICARE LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
LAURENCE MATHIS
Defendant:
UNICARE LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY and LORD & TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BISHOP ANTHONEE J. PATTERSON v. SHELTON et al
as 2:2016mc00168
Plaintiff:
BISHOP ANTHONEE J. PATTERSON
Defendant:
KENNETH SHELTON , JOHN CARLTON SHELTON THOMAS , LEON BLIGEN and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. FEGOMETIOTOIS
as 2:2015cv05857
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MATTHEW LORD
Defendant:
ANTONIOS FEGOMETIOTOIS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. FENGOMETIOS
as 2:2015cv05858
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MATTHEW LORD
Defendant:
ANTONIO FENGOMETIOS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. TONY'S FOOD VENDING COMPANY
as 2:2015cv05856
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MATTHEW LORD
Defendant:
TONY'S FOOD VENDING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. KIRTON
as 2:2015cv04593
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MATTHEW LORD
Defendant:
TERREYL KIRTON
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604 a IRS: Complaint to Enforce IRS Summons
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. HORN
as 2:2015cv04164
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MATTHEW LORD
Defendant:
ROBERT J. HORN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. TITH
as 2:2015cv03873
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MATTHEW LORD
Defendant:
SEANG TITH
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
