Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Bell v. Loyola University Medical Center
as 1:2017cv02783
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bell
Defendant:
Loyola University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER, INC. et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv01042
Plaintiff:
OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER, INC. , BEAUMONT HOSPITAL- GROSSE POINTE , BEAUMONT HOSPITAL-ROYAL OAK and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1006
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10955
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDaniel v. Loyola University Medical Center et al
as 1:2013cv06500
Plaintiff:
Mark D McDaniel
Defendant:
Loyola University Medical Center , Trinity Health Corporation, Loyola University Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexander Chi v. Loyola University Medical Cen
as 13-1883
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALEXANDER CHI, Doctor
Defendant - Appellant:
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
Alexander Chi v. Loyola University Medical Cen
as 13-1600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER CHI, Doctor
Defendant - Appellee:
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and SUNEEL NAGDA
Gomaa v. Loyola University Medical Center
as 1:2012cv08960
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Gomaa
Defendant:
Loyola University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Gomaa v. Loyola University Medical Center
as 1:2012cv08962
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Gomaa
Defendant:
Loyola University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chi v. Loyola University Medical Center et al
as 4:2012mc00015
Plaintiff:
Alexander Chi
Defendant:
Loyola University Medical Center , Suneel Nagda and University of Arizona Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
