Cases 21 - 30 of 4,176
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 24-20231
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Soliz v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Jesus Soliz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Luther Dwayne Parks
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans Jr. v. Lumpkin Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Texas- Tyler.
as 4:2024cv01950
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Venhaus v. Abbott
as 24-50406
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Venhaus
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Bryan Collier and others
Mendez v. Lumpkin
as 24-20222
Petitioner:
Jose Guillermo Mendez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Macias v. Lumpkin
as 24-20218
Petitioner:
Carlos Arturo Macias
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tatum v. Lumpkin
as 24-20219
Petitioner:
Steven Tatum
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Lucas v. Lumpkin
as 24-40359
Petitioner:
Aaron Lucas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 24-40361
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin Caldwell
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
