Cases 21 - 30 of 104
Roy v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv12103
Defendant:
Vita A. Cassese, John R. Whitten, Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Isabelle Roy
Wallace et al v. Rooke et al
as 3:2019cv30109
Defendant:
Martin E Germain, City of Springfield, James D Goldrick and others
Plaintiff:
Leo Fennell, Leslie Wallace and Melissa Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magill et al v. Elysian Global Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv11208
Plaintiff:
David Blumsack, Keith J. Magill and Jacob Blumsack
Defendant:
Jesse Brandenburg, Elysian Global Corporation, Leo Ameri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Liviz Sr. v. Sorokin
as 1:2019cv10392
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist Ilya Liviz Sr.
Defendant:
Judge Leo T. Sorokin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liviz v. Howard et al
as 1:2019cv10096
Defendant:
William J. Kayatta, Jeffrey R. Howard, Juan R. Torruella and others
Plaintiff:
Ilya Liviz Jr. and Ilya Liviz Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United State of America, et al
as 1:2018cv12620
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Louisiana Supreme Court, Kansas Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist ilya Liviz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Clapp v. Baker et al
as 1:2018cv10426
Plaintiff:
Kevin S. Clapp
Defendant:
Charles Baker, Michael W. Morrissey, Richard McKeon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Innocent v. Harbor One et al
as 4:2017cv40139
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Innocent
Defendant:
Harbor One, James Blake, Leo Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddinger et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2017cv12002
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Leo Eddinger and Karen Eddinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paulding et al v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 1:2017cv11340
Defendant:
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Leo Paulding and victoria paulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
