Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Albertson v. District of Columbia, United States et al
as 1:2012cv01096
Defendant:
Ann Aiken, Leo Henry Albertson, Jr., Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Lake County and others
Plaintiff:
Leo Henry Albertson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Christian v. Nooth
as 2:2012cv01080
Petitioner:
Leo James Christian
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Turner v. Advantage N.W. Credit Union
as 3:2011cv00563
Defendant:
Advantage N.W. Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Leo Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perth v. United States of America
as 3:2011cv00361
Plaintiff:
Leo Perth
Defendant:
Robert Schmelz and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Washington v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2011cv00318
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Richmond v. U.S. Government et al
as 3:2011cv00209
Defendant:
Gary Barbour, Bret Barnum, Pat Bender and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall C. Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartfield vs Besner, etc, et al
as 3:2011cv00100
Defendant:
Leo Besner and City of Portland
Plaintiff:
Sean L. Hartfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian v. Nooth
as 3:2010cv01032
Petitioner:
Leo James Christian
Respondent:
Mr. Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sabalza-Solano et al v. Leo Gentry Wholesale Nursery, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00812
Plaintiff:
Silveria Sabalza-Solano, Silveria Sabalza-Solano, Maria De La Cruz Venegas-Pacheco and others
Defendant:
Leo Gentry Wholesale Nursery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
