Cases 21 - 30 of 230
Fisher et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
John T. Fisher, III, Annie S. Fisher, Sara D. Murray and others
Defendant:
Abner Smith, Jonathan Kasper, Dana Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
DAVIS v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2022cv00067
Petitioner:
DONALD LEROY DAVIS
Respondent:
WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cal Properties, Inc. et al v. World Business Lender, LLC
as 1:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Cal Properties, Inc. and Leroy Donice Calhoun, Jr.
Defendant:
World Business Lender, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McSmith v. Georgia Thrift Stores, Inc.
as 1:2021mi00110
Plaintiff:
Derek LeRoy McSmith
Defendant:
Georgia Thrift Stores, Inc. doing business as Value Village
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
McSmith v. Georgia Thrift Stores, Inc.
as 1:2021mi00099
Plaintiff:
Derek LeRoy McSmith
Defendant:
Georgia Thrift Stores, Inc. doing business as Value Village
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
14th Peachtree Apartment Holdings, LLC v. Leroy
as 1:2021cv04537
Plaintiff:
14th Peachtree Apartment Holdings, LLC doing business as Icon Midtown
Defendant:
Sarah Leroy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clark et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04461
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Clark, Leroy Rogers, DeAngelo Cook and others
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Sutton Richardson, Stephen Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dillard v. Unnamed Respondent(s)
as 1:2021cv01309
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent(s)
Petitioner:
Leonard Leroy Dillard, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
