Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2014cv01611
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Anderson v. John Baldwin, et al
as 14-1772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Leroy Anderson
Defendant - Appellee:
John Baldwin, IDOC Director, Terry Mapes, Warden, Jill Dursky, Assoc. Warden and others
Anderson v. Morrison et al
as 1:2013cv08622
Plaintiff:
Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
Imhotep Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2013cv00347
Plaintiff:
Michael Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jerry Barteoff, Ron Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Michael Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Terry Mapes, Jill Dursky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Mapes
as 4:2013cv00287
Petitioner:
Michael Leroy Anderson
Respondent:
Terry Mapes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rentfro et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv02056
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Rentfro , Sherwin Savage , Robert Hendricks and others
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael Puisis, Louis Schicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Leroy Anderson
as 12-16432
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LEROY ANDERSON
ANDERSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv46174
Plaintiff:
LEROY ANDERSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Anderson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2011cv00219
Plaintiff:
Michael Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Terry Mapes, Jill Dursky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
