Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Sheridan Ross P.C., et al v. Florida Power & Light Company
as 1:2012cv02159
Petitioner:
Sheridan Ross P.C. and Joseph Kovarik, ESQ
Respondent:
Florida Power & Light Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Black and McDonald/Custom Lighting Services et al
as 1:2012cv01718
Defendant:
Black and McDonald/Custom Lighting Services and Theresa L Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Diogen Lighting, Inc. v. Neo-Neon Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2010cv02752
Plaintiff:
Diogen Lighting, Inc.
Defendant:
Neo-Neon Holdings Limited, Neo-Neon LED Lighting International, Limited and Neo-Neon Lighting International Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Belfor USA Group, Inc. v. Fox et al
as 1:2010cv02152
Plaintiff:
Belfor USA Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Judith P. Fox, Deborah T. Owen, Craig Plamp and others
Counter_claimant:
One Thousand South Monaco Condominium Association
Counter_defendant:
Belfor USA Group, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
One Thousand South Monaco Condominium Association
Thirdparty_defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Twenty-Six High Intensity Grow Lights et al
as 1:2010cv00314
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Twenty-Six High Intensity Grow Lights and Sixteen Ballasts
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Pinnacle Architectural Lighting, Inc. v. US LED, Ltd.
as 1:2009cv01157
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle Architectural Lighting, Inc.
Defendant:
US LED, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
L&W Innovations, LLC v. Linli Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00563
Plaintiff:
L&W Innovations, LLC and L&W Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Linli Construction, Inc., John Yelenick, Gas-O-Haul, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
