Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Lovell v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv20797
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Lovell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lovell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv19789
Plaintiff:
Anna Dockins Lovell and Carl Huel Lovell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Casto et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv13323
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Casto and Lovell Casto
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv07782
Plaintiff:
Ellen Lovell Miller and Truie Miller
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lovell v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00722
Plaintiff:
Jessica G. Lovell
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lovell v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02974
Plaintiff:
Charloette Lovell
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gray v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv00262
Petitioner:
Cedric Lovelle Gray
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Griffin v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2006cv00327
Petitioner:
Lovell Griffin
Respondent:
Jim Rubenstein, Bobby Hamricks, Bluefield Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burdette v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
Leah Lovelle Burdette
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
