Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Randle v. State of Texas
as 3:2018cv02751
Respondent:
State of Texas
Petitioner:
Sollie Lucky Randle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Johnson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2017cv00653
Plaintiff:
Demeia Johnson , Daniel Hudnall , Demonicia Johnson and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Metra White , Tony Handsborough , Katrina Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Best Lucky International Enterprise Corp. v. The Battery Experts, LLC
as 4:2017cv00581
Plaintiff:
Best Lucky International Enterprise Corp.
Defendant:
The Battery Experts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
FILING ERROR
as 5:2016cv01247
361) 687 - 2583 (fax:
Lucky Cousins Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Martin Pichardo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pichardo v. Lucky Cousins Trucking, Inc.
as 5:2016cv01248
361) 687 - 2583 (fax:
Lucky Cousins Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Martin Pichardo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
B-Lucky Express LLC v. CH Robinson Company Inc et al
as 3:2016cv03104
Plaintiff:
B-Lucky Express LLC
Garnishee:
CH Robinson Company Inc, Pacific Financial Association Inc, Alexis Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
B Lucky Express LLC v. Castillo et al
as 3:2016cv02467
Plaintiff:
B Lucky Express, LLC
Defendant:
Alexis Castillo, Pablo Castillo Castro and Celia Alma Padilla Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
