Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Dadoush et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv02815
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Dadoush , Richard Kennedy , Sara Kerby and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company, Aaipharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ac Diversity-Account Receivable
Anderson v. Wilson et al
as 4:2012cv05297
Plaintiff:
Andrew S. Anderson
Defendant:
W. J. Wilson, Barbara Lusk, D. Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Portades v. Lusk, et al
as 2:2011cv03404
Plaintiff:
Jovany S. Portades
Defendant:
Lusk and Prowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Premier Pool Management Corp. v. Lusk et al
as 2:2011cv02896
Plaintiff:
Premier Pool Management Corp.
Defendant:
Franklin Dean Lusk and Jason Lusk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Richard W Lusk v. Mary L Kellogg et al
as 8:2011cv00087
Defendant:
Mary L Kellogg and Union Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Richard W Lusk
Lusk v. Bank of America, NA
as 2:2010cv03413
Plaintiff:
Cal Lusk
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Lusk et al v. A.B. Boyd Co. et al
as 2:2008cv07548
Plaintiff:
John Lusk, John Lusk, John Lusk and others
Defendant:
A.B. Boyd Co., A. O. Smith Corporation, National Steel and Shipbuilding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008at00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Camarillo Unified et al v. California State Board of Education et al
as 2:2008cv02650
Plaintiff:
Camarillo Unified, Camarillo Unified, Camarillo Unified and others
Defendant:
California State Board of Education, Theodore R Mitchell, Kenneth Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
