Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Smith v. Veterans Administration et al
as 2:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Defendant:
Veterans Administration, FNU Penn, FNU Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA et al
as 2:2009cv00985
Defendant:
USA, United States Constitution, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dana Smith v. Johnn Hardison, et al
as 09-35788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA LYDELL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNN HARDISON, Warden, PHILIP VALDEZ, JOHN DOES, All officers trained to use O/C in Idaho Department of Correction and others
Smith v. State of Idaho, et al
as 09-4155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA LYDELL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, GOVERNOR STATE OF IDAHO, ATTORNEY FOR GOVERNOR STATE OF IDAHO and others
Smith v. Valdez et al
as 2:2009cv00620
Petitioner:
Dana Lydell Smith
Respondent:
Phillip Valdez, Correctional Corporation of America and State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Valdez
as 1:2009cv00251
Petitioner:
Dana Lydell Smith
Respondent:
Phillip Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Correctional Corporation of America Inc
as 1:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v District Court Clerk
as 1:2008cv00501
Petitioner:
Dana Lydell Smith
Respondent:
District Court Clerk
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dana Smith v. U.S. Constitution
as 08-35930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA LYDELL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. CONSTITUTION
Smith v. Idaho State of
as 1:2008cv00432
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Defendant:
Idaho State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
