Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Frampton v. Magana
as 1:2015cv10569
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Frampton
Defendant:
Michael A. Magana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foday et al v. Air Check, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10205
Defendant:
Air Check, Inc. , Mark S Rathke , Teresa Kaminska and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Foday and Fred Berrios
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Minter v. Diamond et al
as 1:2015cv04323
Plaintiff:
Louise Minter
Defendant:
Mark S. Diamond, United Residential Services and Real Estate, Inc., Dennis E Both and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Laborers' International Union of North America Local #165 v. Ackerman
as 1:2015cv01119
Plaintiff:
Laborers' International Union of North America Local #165
Defendant:
Mark S. Ackerman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Harris et al v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04261
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Harris and Elaine Harris
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc , Abbott Laboratories Inc. , Eli Lilly and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Diamond et al
as 1:2014cv02601
Plaintiff:
sudie green
Defendant:
Mark S Diamond, United Residential Services & Real Estate, Inc., American Fidelity Financial Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Bramlett v. Isaacs et al
as 3:2013cv01177
Plaintiff:
Charles E Bramlett
Defendant:
Mark S Carich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belk v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2013cv00841
Plaintiff:
Cameron Belk, Sr
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Glenn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bramlett v. Carich, et al
as 3:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Charles E Bramlett
Defendant:
Mark S Carich and Jessica Stover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
