Cases 21 - 30 of 230
Young v. Leu
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Maurice Bernard Young
Defendant:
Warden David Leu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00120
Petitioner:
Maurice Antione Hubbard
Respondent:
USA and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boykins v. Taylor et al
as 7:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dontrell Boykins
Defendant:
Officer Taylor and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barksdale v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00087
Petitioner:
Shuron Maurice Barksdale
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emile v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maurice Emile
Defendant:
H.W. Clarke, L.T. Edmons, K.T. Punturi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe) v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, The General Insurance Company, SunTrust Banks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employee Benefits
Whitfield v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Whitfield
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail and Hampton Roads Regional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitefield v. Medical Staff et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Whitefield and David Maurice Whitfield
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Sgt. Artis, Sgt. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfoot v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Rodney William Lightfoot
Defendant:
Clent D. Davis, M. Maurice and M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaBarge v. Streeval et al
as 7:2022cv00476
Petitioner:
Branden Maurice LaBarge
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval and William Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
