Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 1:2017cv00056
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Scott J. Castro, George E. McDow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 4:2017cv01163
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Sharon D. Allen, John D. Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 3:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Sharon D. Allen, John D. Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Woods
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McGowan et al v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings et al
as 4:2015cv03683
Plaintiff:
James McGowan and Jacqueline McGowan
Defendant:
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings , Laboratory Corporation of America and Gessner-Houston, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelms et al v. CPSG Partners LLC et al
as 3:2015cv03458
Plaintiff:
Steven Nelms
Defendant:
CPSG Partners LLC , Bryan McGowan and Rohit Mehrotra
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McGowan et al v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 3:2015cv03155
Plaintiff:
Beverly Kirkpatrick McGowan and Mark McGowan
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bixby et al v. KBR Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv02768
Plaintiff:
Rocky Bixby , Lawrence Roberta , Scott Ashby and others
Defendant:
KBR Inc. , Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc , KBR Technical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
