Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Byrd v. Rivera
as 4:2010cv01632
Petitioner:
Pierre A Byrd
Respondent:
Mildred L Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gambrell v. Rivera et al
as 8:2010cv00566
Petitioner:
Rodricka J Gambrell
Respondent:
Mildred L Rivera and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McKelvey v. Rivera et al
as 4:2010cv00422
Petitioner:
Johnnie Elvin McKelvey
Respondent:
Mildred L Rivera and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Byrd v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2008cv03540
Plaintiff:
Steven Allen Byrd
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mildred L Rivera, Zoltan R Vendel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. Rivera et al
as 6:2008cv02540
Plaintiff:
Ira Jerome Moore
Defendant:
Mildred L Rivera, John R Owen, Steve Labier and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv03498
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Devita v. Rivera
as 6:2007cv03459
Petitioner:
Vincent Devita
Respondent:
Mildred L Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Truesdale et al v. Gonzales et al
as 8:2007cv03057
Plaintiff:
Alvin B Truesdale, David Hill, David Harrell and others
Defendant:
Alberto R Gonzales, Mildred L Rivera, Harley G Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Fox v. Rivera
as 2:2007cv03051
Petitioner:
Clarence T Fox, Jr
Respondent:
Mildred L Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marriott v. Rivera
as 0:2007cv02916
Petitioner:
Paul Marriott
Respondent:
Mildred L Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
