Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Candice Nicole Maddox v. Allergan, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv01254
Defendant:
Allergan, Inc., Allergan Holdings, Inc., Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Candice Nicole Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M. et al v. Maximus Real Estate Partners, LTD. et al
as 3:2019cv06008
Defendant:
Maximus Real Estate Partners, LTD., Alameda Multifamily Owner, LLC and South Shore Apartments
Plaintiff:
Howard Maddox, A. M. and Karla Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stock v. Stanislaus County et al
as 1:2019cv01598
Defendant:
Stanislaus County, Stanislaus County Behavioral Health & Recovery Services, Marina Wilbur and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Stock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 3:2019cv01723
Plaintiff:
Brent D. Maddox
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America, -
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Raymond Peaschek v. Maddox Concrete, Inc.
as 5:2019cv01385
Defendant:
Maddox Concrete, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raymond Peaschek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
(HC) Maddox v. Parr
as 1:2019cv00851
Respondent:
M. Parr
Petitioner:
Thomas Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. DC and DS Maddox, L.P. et al
as 8:2018cv02180
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Anna Marie Wiggins and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
DC & DS MADDOX, L.P., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and DC and DS Maddox, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grant v. Heisol et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Russell S. Grant
Defendant:
Heisol, G. Wright, J. Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nexium Esomeprazole
as 2:2012ml02404
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Marquerite Echols, Mae Joyce Terry, Peggy Kezer and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Richardson, Rebecca Reid, Angelena Moore and others
Defendant:
KBI Sub Inc and AstraZeneca LP
Consolidated Defendant:
Sherry Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
